|
|
Thriving in a Brave New World by Ian S. Hayes
Do you remember the Pickett company? Before the advent
of the electronic calculator, you may recall learning to use a slide rule,
a clever mechanical device for performing a variety of mathematical
functions. Invented in 1622, slide rules were the tools of choice for
anyone needing to solve complex mathematical equations quickly. Pickett
was one of the most successful slide rule manufacturers, producing a
variety of models for everyone from students to doctors and engineers. But
in 1968, the first electronic calculator reached the market. By the end of
the 1970s, slide rules and Pickett were obsolete. Was Pickett an inevitable victim of progress? A quick
look says, Yes. Although slide rules and calculators perform the same
functions, their design and manufacture are entirely different. Slide
rules are precision mechanical instruments constructed of wood, plastic
and metal, while calculators rely on electronics and computer chips. To
build calculators, Pickett would have needed to invest in expensive new
facilities and radically new skills. Worse, it would have to perform the
switch at a time when its sales and revenues were plummeting in the dying
slide rule market, and new competitors, such as Hewlett-Packard and Texas
Instruments, had already established a commanding market lead. Unable to
respond to these challenges, Pickett vanished. Does this story line sound familiar? It should. It has
recurred many times in many industries as part of the e-business
transformation. It is also occurring within IT organizations today. The
theme is simple. An enterprise continues to perform its business,
following the same model that has proved successful in the past and fails
to recognize and adopt new models in time. The result appears inevitable.
But is it? Much depends on how the organization views itself. If we view
Pickett solely as a manufacturer of slide rules, the transformation
required was too large and the company’s demise was inevitable. But if
we deconstruct Pickett using current business principles, we unearth
valuable components that could have continued successfully in a post-slide
rule world. Corporate IT organizations are on the verge of a
transformation that, over time, will be every bit as radical as the one
faced by Pickett. Changing technologies, shifting skill bases, and new
means of providing application functionality and IT services are
conspiring to make traditional internal IT organizations obsolete. The
organizations that take their place will provide very different services
to their companies. Like Pickett, IT professionals face the choice of
maintaining the status quo until the inevitable happens, or re-inventing
themselves to take advantage of the coming changes and emerging stronger
than ever before. This article explores why IT is not immune from its own
e-business transformations, how those transformations are likely to affect
IT organizations, and how to gain advantage from those changes. There is
no reason to fear change. Just as calculators represented a major leap
forward over slide rules, IT organizations of the future will provide even
greater benefits for their companies and employees. Why E-business will Change IT Deconstruction is at the heart of e-business
transformation. It takes a traditional organization, consisting of many
intertwined components, and separates and recombines those components into
new ways to add value. For example, instead of viewing Pickett as a slide
rule manufacturer, the company could be redefined as a provider of
mathematical solutions to a large customer base along with a precision
manufacturing organization. Where Pickett as a whole would be unable to
survive the onslaught of calculators, splitting Pickett in this manner
would permit each component to take advantage of its value. As a provider of mathematical solutions, Pickett's vast
customer base was an extremely valuable asset. Pickett had excellent brand
recognition and a strong reputation among its customers -- the same
customers sought by the calculator manufacturers. This component of
Pickett could have exploited its customer relationships to become the
premier distributor of mathematical solutions, selling calculators
manufactured by others, and even selling spreadsheets and other
mathematical software. By abandoning the construction of slide rules, the
manufacturing component of the company could have turned its attention to
other precision manufacturing tasks on a contract basis, thereby building
its own base of customers and exiting the mathematical solution business
entirely. As a combination, the components could not survive, but
separately they would have been free to create value. The IT Value Chain The same type of deconstruction can be applied to the
IT world. The typical IT organization tends to provide a mixture of
functions to its host enterprise. Some functions are clearly value-added,
such as creating applications that generate revenues or provide
competitive advantage. Other functions, while quite necessary, are far
removed from the bottom line and thus viewed as overhead. This principle
is best illustrated by examining a typical IT project In this example, an employee discovers a way to save
$10 million per year by redesigning the company's distribution system and
processes. Over ten years, this idea has the potential to create $100
million in value. Developing this idea is a highly value-adding activity.
To realize this value, the company must perform a series of steps to build
and operate the new system. Some steps, such as developing the
implementation strategy, may enhance the overall potential value of the
idea by uncovering opportunities missed by the originator. The
implementation translates the concept's potential value into actual value,
but creates no new value of its own. By keeping implementation costs low,
the company derives greater final value. The same principle is true for
the operation of the new system. Implementation and operation are
essential, but when decoupled from the value-creating idea, they are
subject to very different management and economic pressures. Figure 2 shows the breakdown of activities associated
with the conception, implementation, and operation of the distribution
system. The most value-creating activities are highly skilled and
company-specific. The commodity activities at the lower end of the scale
may be highly skilled, but they are not company-specific. Those skills are
commodities (albeit valuable and often scarce) that can be obtained as
needed from outside of the company. Changing Core Competence Following the IT value chain identifies possible areas
for deconstruction, but areas of core competence determine where the
actual deconstruction takes place. In Pickett's case, its core
competencies were supporting mathematical calculations and precision
manufacturing. Traditionally, the core competencies of IT organizations
included project management, system analysis, system development and data
processing operations. In days past, computer literacy was primarily
confined to the IT organization, and companies tended to build most of
their systems from scratch. Recently, the IT landscape has begun to change
significantly. To illustrate: In this pressured environment, companies are rethinking
their approach to IT. Outsourcing and other creative sourcing approaches
are capturing the commodity end of IT services. While some IT
organizations continue to develop new systems internally, more companies
are opting to purchase needed functionality. Caught between increasingly
computer-capable business areas and aggressive external providers, IT
professionals cannot cling to their traditional competencies. IT can
thrive, however, by shifting its focus and competencies up the IT value
chain. Strategy and program management capabilities will be the core
competencies of the IT organization of the future. A Prescription for Thriving in the Future Are IT organizations dinosaurs doomed to extinction?
No! Just as calculators provided a more effective means of performing
mathematical operations, new age IT organizations will provide faster,
more effective services to their companies. All of the functions currently
performed by IT will still be performed, but not necessarily within the IT
organization. If you have little interest in your company's core business
or want to be a pure technologist, a software company or consulting firm
is likely to be the preferable career option. Going forward, most of a
company's pure technology will be purchased externally. As a future IT professional, your true strength and
value is the ability to apply technology to your company's business
requirements. You must have the business knowledge to understand those
requirements, an understanding of available technologies and how to apply
them, the ability to muster the resources to implement those technologies,
and the project and program management skills to oversee the
implementation. Here are some useful tips: 1. Strengthen your business knowledge. A solid understanding of your company's industry,
practices, and business strategy marks the greatest distinction between
you and the experience offered by outside providers. This knowledge
enables you to identify and apply the best available solutions to your
company's needs. Make a real effort to learn your company's business and
develop relationships with people outside of IT. As a shared resource, IT
offers connections into virtually every company function. As a result, you
can develop a holistic perspective on your entire company and be in an
ideal position to identify and exploit cross-organizational synergies.
Despite the obviousness of this step, remarkably few IT professionals
actually invest the effort to learn about their company’s business. 2. Keep up with a broad range of technologies. The internal IT professional of the future needs a
broad understanding of current technologies and trends in order to
evaluate how those technologies can provide value to the company. Breadth
rather than depth is the objective. Read white papers and industry
publications, attend conferences, and consult analysts. You don't have to
be a specialist in any given area; you need to know enough to see how that
technology could bring value to your company. Remember that specialists in
arcane implementation details can be obtained as needed from external
sources. 3. Become a program manager. Program and project management skills will become even
more valuable. Major initiatives in areas such as e-business or enterprise
resource planning require the coordination of many business and technical
subprojects as well as the coordination of a variety of internal and
external resources. While outside resources can manage their own
subprojects, the company must manage the implementation of the program. IT
professionals are used to managing these types of cross-functional efforts
and can capitalize on their internal relationships and knowledge of
company practices to guide projects past the inevitable roadblocks. 4. Become adept at offloading tasks. Get away from the "not invented here"
syndrome. Use the most expedient and effective resources to accomplish the
tasks at hand. The goal is to make your company as successful as possible,
not to protect ingrained structures. Don't build if you can buy, and
develop the skills to identify and retain the best possible resources for
each project. Over time, more and more of those resources will be obtained
externally. Move up the IT value chain by concentrating your efforts on
the tasks that create value for your company while offloading generic and
commodity tasks to companies specializing in those areas. |
|
|